Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (14) - Music (1) - Games (6)

Gold review

Posted : 5 years, 7 months ago on 28 August 2018 04:18 (A review of Gold)

Starring Roger Moore, 1974's Gold feels like a spin off from the Bond movies in many ways. Directed by Peter Hunt who had previously helmed On Her Majesty's Secret Service, it also involved several other crew members who had worked on the Bond franchise such as the editor John Glen. The title sequence was designed by Maurice Binder and feels very Bond-ish, as well as somewhat of a precursor to the long running soap opera Dallas. It also features a theme tune sung by Jimmy Helms which runs over the title sequence in very much the same manner as they do in Bond movies. I was half expecting him to start singing about someone who loves only Gold, though that didn't happen, possibly for copyright reasons.

Moore must have been a pretty busy man in this period as this was released just a year after his Bond debut in Live and Let Die and the same year as his second appearance as the secret agent in The Man with the Golden Gun. As Rod Slater he gets involved in the same sort of shenanigans as he does as Bond, he's somewhat of an action hero, has a romance subplot and appears in exotic locations in South Africa. They are somewhat less romanticised than the Bond settings, with much of the action taking place in and around a Gold Mine which is quite realistically portrayed.

Apparently the shoot was controversial at the time as South Africa was under the apartheid regime but the film is interesting in retrospect in terms of the story which clearly portrays the miners, who are nearly all black, as the victims of ruthless white capitalists who endanger their very lives in order to personally profit. Although Slater is clearly personally quite heroic, he is arguably outshone by the black miner 'Big King' who helps him out.

In conducting her romance with Slater, Terry Steyner, played by Susannah York has somewhat enigmatic motivations which give the character greater depth than the love interest of the Bond movies. I did feel this aspect of the script could have been developed a bit more, however.

Gold suffers from a somewhat plodding narrative and some scenes such as a long dance sequence with African performers feel like pure filler, although audiences at the time may have appreciated the somewhat National Geographic style sequence due to unfamiliarity with the setting. It does pick up towards the end, and as you would expect from people associated with the Bond franchise there are some pretty exciting action sequences which are set in the mine itself.

Overall, Gold is an interesting movie with respect to its left-leaning script, good performances throughout and unusual setting. Whilst other films have featured scenes set in mines they have usually been made on sound stages and Gold benefits a great deal from using an actual mine for shooting, which gives some scenes a feel of documentary realism. Whilst it isn't pure Gold it is certainly a fairly decent Silver.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Ridiculous, but fun

Posted : 8 years ago on 18 March 2016 11:35 (A review of Resident Evil: Revelations)

There is a tendency for video game sequels to rely on formula, essentially recycling the format of the previous titles in the series with some minor changes to certain aspects of the game. This is essentially the approach taken by Resident Evil: Revelations.  If you have played any other release from the RE franchise then you're probably expecting it to include some of the following: a virus which turns people into horrible mutations, a conspiracy, a lab, a boss fight with a gigantic beast.  This indeed is what RE: Revelations has to offer.


This isn't really a bad thing.  From the start of the game I found this to be pretty compelling to play.  The storyline is completely ridiculous, as usual, but it's undeniably fun and it moves along at an impressive pace so that it never becomes dull.  The gameplay is very much in the style of Resident Evil 5 with the characters being easier to control than the older RE efforts.  The emphasis is firmly on action.  Revelations never really tries to scare the player much but aims to offer exciting action and on this level the game is certainly successful.  As with RE5 you are accompanied throughout by a companion which lessens the sense of isolation but ups the action quota, with both characters blazing away at whatever monstrosities the game throws at them.  A selection of weaponry is available which offers a nice tactical element to play, as some weapons seem to be more effective against certain enemies or in particular situations.  Also missing is the old inventory management system which is a boon in terms of keeping up the game's pace.  You can carry anything you can come across with no problems (though there is a cap on maximum amounts) and you never have to mix up herbs to create a stronger concoction.  There is only one type of herb this time and it heals all damage sustained.   This time the game switches between various characters and times in the story which was an interesting and enjoyable innovation.


Most of the action takes place on an ocean liner but unfortunately the game never really fulfils the promise of this setting in the same way that the old PS2 title Cold Fear did.  There are only a couple of moments where any attempt  was made to portray the sensation of the boat rocking about in reaction to the movement of the sea which was disappointing.  A later level also drew on disaster movies like The Poseidon Adventure but the results were less accomplished and striking than those achieved in a similar setting by Uncharted 3.


Presentation-wise Revelations was a pretty smart looking title.  The character models are well realised and the settings are generally impressive with some nice lighting effects which added to the atmosphere.  Sound design was also well crafted with each monster making a distinctive unpleasant moaning noise which helps the player to identify the source of a threat.  The musical score was also accomplished and used a more cinematic style than the more off-kilter melodies of the original Resident Evil.


Once the campaign has been completed the usual New Game Plus option is on offer allowing you to keep weapons gained throughout play for a second run through, as well as the option to change your outfit if you so wish.  This adds good replay value to a campaign of moderate length.  You are also scored in ranking system on how well you did on each level, a spur to improving your performance which was a nice touch.  In addition to the campaign Revelations also offers a Raid mode which takes sections of the campaign which you can play through either Solo or cooperatively online.  This is as much fun as the campaign, offering plenty of options on characters with skills in certain areas and a multitude of weapons and modifications available.  As with the campaign you are scored on your performance.


One RE tradition which makes a comeback is the hokey plot accompanied by wooden voice acting and terrible dialogue.  Personally I find this to be all part of the entertainment and I was laughing out loud at such gems as 'these tentacles are really annoying'!  The story doesn't really hold water in terms of logic but does work in terms of keeping you interested in how things will play out.  This is a game where a shipwreck resting at the bottom of the sea still has a working electrical system and ocean liners have rooms which look like those from a mansion.  If you embrace this ridiculous style then you will enjoy what the game has to offer.


Overall, Revelations is a pretty good RE title.  If you disliked the more action oriented RE style since RE4 then this won't be to your taste as it isn't really a survival horror title any more.  Otherwise I can highly recommend that you check this one out.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

I've been here before

Posted : 8 years, 4 months ago on 5 November 2015 06:48 (A review of Spectre)

The Bond movies are noted for their pre-credits sequences and Spectre is no exception in that respect.  The opening scenes in Mexico City are quite spectacular and technically brilliant, featuring a fantastic lengthy tracking shot which lasts for several minutes without any edits.  The choreography is extremely accomplished and the action quite gripping.  It's arguably one of the best opening sequences of any Bond feature.

After that Spectre becomes somewhat of a business as usual effort.  The themes of mortality and surveillance were quite interesting and certainly gave the film a contemporary feel but neither are explored in any great depth, which was disappointing.  At one point Bond tells someone that he kills people for a living, following which it would have been interesting if he had reflected on his own mortality but the writers preferred to move him quickly on to the next action sequence.  A shame.  Spectre is certainly a well mounted production, the action sequences are exciting, the cast give strong performances and the exotic locations are as enjoyable as ever.  Plot-wise however, it was all somewhat of a Bond by numbers and it all felt rather generic.  I would have liked to have seen more innovation but this was a very self-referential film, with many scenes being simply pastiches of previous adventures; the costumes at the beginning echo that of Baron Samedi from Live and Let Die, there is a fight on a train, as in From Russia With Love and The Spy Who Loved Me, the bad guy has a massive base in the Ken Adam mould and is surrounded by the usual set of ineffective goons who serve as cannon fodder for Bond.  It's an approach that is somewhat reminiscent of the final Pierce Brosnan outing Die Another Day and although Spectre was certainly superior to that weak effort, in terms of imagination it was far from what the series has achieved in the past.  There are also some connections with the other Daniel Craig Bond films but these didn't really add anything to the story and stretched credulity.  A couple of Craig-era motifs also reappear; Bond is a loose cannon (again) and he ends up in collapsing buildings at a few points.  All of which is feeling a bit tired by now. 

A novelty this time is that one of the Bond girls is much older than usual.  Played by Monica Bellucci, Lucia Sciarra becomes another notch on Bond's bedpost, which must be of record breaking dimensions by now.  Bellucci was good in the part but her brief appearance serves mainly as a plot element to enable Bond to infiltrate the engimatic Spectre organisation.  I couldn't understand why she was attracted by Bond either, as he is at his least charming at that point.  Maybe she was supposed to be some kind of masochist, or maybe it was just bad writing.  I'm not quite sure.  Bond spends more time with the younger Dr. Madeleine Swann (Lea Seydoux) and his relationship with her was fortunately more involving.  Seydoux was very good in the role and she managed to create a character with a certain level of complexity.

Christoph Waltz played the bad guy this time and his performance is a marked contrast to the larger than life one which was given by Javier Bardem in Skyfall.  This was perhaps a wise choice in that it might have backfired to have more grandiose scene-chewing histrionics, but it did feel a little flat to me.  There is a coldness to Waltz's characterisation reminiscent of Joseph Wiseman's Dr No, with Waltz underplaying every scene.  It successfully conveyed a sociopathic personality but the script didn't give the malevolent head of Spectre much to do so the stakes felt a lot lower than they did in the last Bond movie, resulting in a less engaging story.

Overall Spectre is far from the best in the series, but it is a serviceable effort benefiting from the usual high production values of the series.  I was never bored at any point and there are some exciting sequences to be enjoyed, but it was weaker than the brilliant Skyfall.  I certainly want Bond to return, as he always does, but I hope that the script writers will have had a few new ideas about where to take the series by then.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

In Space No-One Can Hear You .. At All

Posted : 8 years, 5 months ago on 6 October 2015 05:34 (A review of The Martian)

Going for a slow burn introduction before upping the action has been a technique used many times previously by Ridley Scott, but in The Martian he has chosen to hit the ground running by starting with the dramatic events which leave astronaut Mark Watney (Matt Damon) stranded, and apparently without hope of survival or rescue on Mars.  The opening of the film was very effective in immersing the audience in the situation and will doubtless please those who have dismissed the slower pace of previous Scott movies as boring.  As the story progresses the pace does fluctuate between kinetic action set pieces and more thoughtful, leisurely sequences.  The change in mood between sequences is handled very well.

At first The Martian is very much a variant on the Robinson Crusoe story, as was the memorable Cast Away.  Thanks to its setting, however, The Martian offers an interesting spin on the story of a stranded survivor, with Watney having to create ingenious solutions to the challenges of the Martian environment.  He explains what he is doing on recordings made to video-cameras, a device which is somewhat clumsy, but does work well.  It is difficult to see how the story would have worked without resorting to this dramatic licence.  Similarly, everyone in this movie reads out the content of their emails rather than merely typing them.  The depiction of life in a hostile environment is compelling but does not go on for too long as the story switches to looking at the efforts everyone is making back on earth to rescue Watney, once he has successfully contacted Mission Control to inform them that he is still alive.

At this point the film is very much in the territory of Apollo 13, as several rescue plans are examined and then ultimately improvised upon by the boffins at Nasa, Watney and his fellow astronauts.  It does become a little too feelgood at times, with the odd cheesy moment.  There is a nice sense of lightness of touch generally but occasionally this was a film which went too much for corniness.  I liked the fact that Watney was stuck with recordings consisting of disco records, a genre he hated, but it would have been enough for one to appear on the soundtrack once rather than several times.  Using David Bowie's Starman was a little too obvious as well.  Tonally, this resembles a Tony Scott movie rather than a Ridley one at times.

I was impressed by the ensemble cast.  Damon does especially well in the lead role, with the right mixture of stoicism, anxiety, intelligence and humour.  He was ably supported by the likes of Jeff Daniels, Sean Bean and Jessica Chastain.  The film never loses sight of the human aspects of the story and balanced this well with moments of scientific exposition.  I would have liked a few more references to Watney's relationships with his fellow astronauts, as this was somewhat sketchily drawn in the script.

Overall the Martian was a very enjoyable movie.  It looked spectacular (unsurprising for a Scott feature), was well paced, and makes for a compelling emotional journey you will be glad to have embarked upon.  I would have liked to seen the impact psychologically of the astronaut's isolation explored in greater depth but was otherwise rather impressed by the quality of the script.  With only minor flaws, The Martian is definitely worth your time.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

No legend, but no tragedy

Posted : 8 years, 6 months ago on 29 September 2015 05:48 (A review of Legend)

Poorly received by the critics on first release, I was curious as to what this film would be like in comparison with other Ridley Scott works and other fantasy movies.  It was an interesting choice of project following the complex and thematically dense Blade Runner.  Legend is far more straightforward and clearly aimed at a much younger audience.

The first thing that strikes you is the visuals, this is one gorgeous movie.  The lush forest scenes at the beginning have an incredible amount of detail in them, they are like Pre-Raphaelite paintings which have been brought to life.  The set designs and amazing cinematography make the film extremely immersive.  Although fantastic, there is enough realism employed to make the movie seem believable.

The storyline was a fairly standard hero's journey narrative.  The idyllic world portrayed in the opening scenes is soon plunged into crisis when the minions of Darkness kill a unicorn, a creature which apparently preserves the power of Light in this world.  The beautiful Princess Lily (Mia Sara) is also captured and the hero of the film, Jack, played by Tom Cruise, embarks on a quest to rescue her and save the one remaining unicorn, accompanied by a couple of dwarves and a mercurial fairy.  The plot derives from many sources, the world is soon covered by snow, as in The Snow Queen by Hans Christian Andersen, the hero acquires a powerful sword like King Arthur and a scene echoes Greek mythology when he uses a shield to defeat a monster with her own reflection.  The dwarves are somewhat Tolkienesque and there is also a strong Disney influence.  Lily actually breaks into song at one point and I was wondering whether the film was going to be a musical, but it was an isolated moment.  Although there was nothing wrong with the story it was rather unoriginal and older viewers will doubtless find the whole thing a little too predictable.

The characters were also rather bland.  Although it is pretty much standard in this type of yarn for the good guys to be ridiculously good and their enemies to be thoroughly nasty, it would have been nice if there was a little more complexity in their portrayal.  Princess Lily was too good to be true.  Despite her status, she just loves to hang out with the Brueghelesque peasantry in the forest.  She does eventually get some more interesting scenes later on in the movie when to paraphrase Star Wars, she is tempted by the dark side.  Earlier on, she is a little too sickly sweet to be appealing, some wittier dialogue would have made her more palatable for adults.  Jack is similarly thoroughly decent.  Both Sara and Cruise deliver good performances considering the material they are working with (although Cruise looked a bit lost at times), but they are never given any really great lines to deliver.

As usual the bad guys get to have the most fun.  Darkness, played by Tim Curry, gets all of the good lines and delivers an absolutely powerhouse performance.  He is only heard at first and is only revealed during the closing scenes of the film, an interesting choice which did make for a dramatic entrance.  Curry brings everything you could want to the part, sexiness, intelligence, malice, frustration.  He easily steals the movie from everyone else in it and makes Darkness the one truly memorable character in the movie.  Darkness is essentially Satan, portrayed here as an enormous cloven-hoofed red demon.  This could easily have been an embarrassment but thanks to Curry's sterling performance and the brilliant make up and cinematography it was an absolute triumph.  Darkness lair was suitably stygian, the lighting and set designs in this part of the film having a strong John Martin / William Blake feel to them.

According to which version of the movie you get to watch the action is accompanied by either an electronic score by Tangerine Dream (US version) or a traditional orchestral one by Jerry Goldsmith (European release).  I haven't heard the electronic one but the Goldsmith score is a lush, romantic affair which suits the action really well.

Overall, I enjoyed Legend more than I expected.  Due to the unoriginal story and weak characters it is by no means a classic but quality production and beautiful cinematography make it worth considering.  It has flaws certainly, but nevertheless maintained by interest throughout.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Low powered shooter

Posted : 8 years, 7 months ago on 31 August 2015 11:27 (A review of Haze)

Haze must be one of the games with the lowest reputations on the Playstation 3, being seen as a failure by both critics and public alike. It was even voted as the worst game to be released on the PS3 by readers of one magazine in a poll, but is its reputation really deserved?

The game certainly arrived on a tidal wave of hype from the publisher, who described it as a 'Halo beater'. Although it was not the first time that a new FPS had been compared to the classic Xbox franchise, I think it was a combination of the over the top publicity with the reputation of the developer, Free Radical, that led to it being seen as such a disappointment when finally released. Free Radical had previously been best known as the creators of the classic Playstation 2 series, Timesplitters, and some members of the team had worked on the legendary Nintendo 64 title Goldeneye 007. This obviously led to heightened expectations for their first game on what was a new platform at the time.

Essentially a fairly standard FPS, Haze did feature a few innovations. The game is set in the near future where national armies have been replaced by a private corporation called Mantel Global Industries, which is now tasked with all peacekeeping operations which would previously have been the remit of the UN. The player assumes the role of a Mantel soldier called Shane Carpenter whose squad has been assigned a mission to eliminate the leader of a guerrilla movement in South America who has been accused of war crimes such as ethnic cleansing. As well as using conventional weaponry Mantel soldiers are also issued with a performance enhancing drug called Nectar.

It is an interesting premise which gave the game the potential to explore themes including how profit motives affect warfare, could armies utilise pharmaceutical innovations to give them an edge in combat and so on. The storyline draws on various science fiction movies such as the Alien series (Mantel's logo is noticeably similar to the Weyland-Yutani corporation) and Starship Troopers (the influence of propaganda as a motivation for warriors). Unfortunately this potential was wasted due to poor scripting including dialogue which sounded like a first draft, and a storyline which although not bad was too superficial to explore any of the concepts introduced in any real depth. Another issue was the quality of the voice acting which although never sinking to the depths of the first Resident Evil game, isn't particularly accomplished either. At times it sounded like the cast had just been handed their lines and made to read them immediately. Haze really needed a high level of maturity and sophistication to pull of the type of story it was trying to relate but really failed in this area. A game with a similar narrative style was Far Cry 2 which was so much more succesful, benefitting from not only superior scripting but also far better performances from the voice cast. In Far Cry 2 the mysterious bad guy known as the Jackal was both brilliantly played and had wonderful dialogue; Haze's equivalent Merino was mediocre in both respects and so never became all that interesting.

Carpenter was a protagonist who was hard to relate to as well. Usually games take either the approach of a mute lead character or use one with a lot to say. The halfway between the two style employed here was not very effective. With Carpenter not saying much it was very hard to understand his motivation and consequently he did not seem a very believable character.

The gameplay was mostly not particularly different to any other FPS you might have played previously. The guns handle well enough with decent shooting mechanics as you would expect from the Timesplitters team, though the amount of recoil on some weapons is a little excessive. The arsenal is pretty much the standard selection of shotguns, sniper rifles etc. It would have been nice to see some innovations in this aspect of the game. Using the Nectar drug was fun, however as you do get a sense of power from it. The enhancements provided, including the ability to zoom in further with scoped weapons and highlighting enemies did make the game a little too easy when playing at standard difficulty setting.

Level designs were poorly implemented with some areas being ridiculously large for no apparent reason except maybe to make the game last a bit longer, and confusing layouts. It was often hard to tell where you were supposed to go next despite the use of direction markers. There was the odd vehicle section which did give the game some much needed variety. These parts worked well enough, but weren't actually as well done as their equivalents in the PS2 Red Faction games. Some, such as a scene where you control a helicopter's gun ended far too quickly, giving the impression that the game was rushed out. Occassionally the game has a go at a setpiece action scene, such as one where you are on a ship that rocks around as it comes under attack. It does show some evidence of ambition on the part of the developers but the results don't approach the quality of the Uncharted series, sadly.

The AI wasn't great either. Enemy soldiers showed virtually no sign of tactical awareness, preferring to stare at neighbouring walls at times rather than the direction of gunfire, and they don't favour using cover much either. Your fellow squad members make some attempt to help out but are similarly incompetent so aren't much use. You can revive them if they take too many hits but there really wasn't much advantage to be gained by doing so. They also seem to appear and disappear in a fairly random fashion, giving the impression that the game was never quite finished.

Graphically, Haze was completely unimpressive in general. Some of the design was not bad and the first sections in the jungle actually work quite well. There were a lot of problems however; interiors were very poor with extremely bland decoration, textures are mainly rather lo-res and the animations were stiff and unimpressive. It mostly was closer to a PS2 quality than you would expect.

Eventually the whole thing wraps up in an assault on a land carrier, which is like an aircraft carrier which travels on land rather than water. Surprisingly, this level was quite accomplished, combining an attack on the carrier from a moving vehicle then driving on to it before progressing through the carrier on foot. It is a shame that the quality achieved here was not matched elsewhere.

Haze also featured several multiplayer modes, including the option to play the campaign online with up to 3 other players, a novelty at the time and rarely done later. The competitive modes were also quite decent with good game balance and a neatly designed use of the abilities featured in the campaign. They aren't anything outstanding but are certainly worth a few hours of your time.

In conclusion Haze is by no means one of the worst games on the PS3. It had a few interesting innovations in fact, but the end result was just too mediocre to succeed. There are so many other FPSes available that a game needs to be really special to stand out; Haze lacks a unique selling point that would make you choose it rather than the other big hitters of the genre such as the Killzone, Resistance or Call of Duty series. A brave attempt at something a little different which didn't turn out as well as it could have done.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Adjust your expectations

Posted : 8 years, 10 months ago on 9 May 2015 10:23 (A review of The Adjustment Bureau)

What if all those odd coincidences in life weren't by chance but were the result of the machinations of a secretive shadowy organisation that is manipulating human destiny? This is the intriguing premise of The Adjustment Bureau, a science fiction / romance film based on a short story by Philip K Dick.

This is definitely a movie for those who believe in love at first sight as politician David Norris, played by Matt Damon, is absolutely besotted with Elise Sellas (Emily Blunt) from their very first meeting. Damon gives a finely crafted performance which channels the oratory skills of John F Kennedy and the charisma of Bill Clinton. Blunt was quite charming which meant that you could believe that Norris would fall for Emily, though the speed at which this occurs was unrealistic and the script would have benefitted from some additional scenes showing how their relationship developed.

Naturally this being a thriller the path to true love is not smooth and the couple soon find their lives disrupted by the mysterious men of the Bureau, a collective of men in suits. It seems that a love affair would be detrimental to the development of Norris's political career so must be ended. Whilst it is an interesting notion that those with successful careers are loveless the film does not explore the concept in any depth at all, unfortunately.

There are indeed some interesting philosophical issues raised by the story such as whether there is free will or predestination, should we prioritise career or personal life, are there unseen aspects of reality which we are unable to perceive, but it soon becomes obvious that this isn't a movie which wants to ponder over any of these issues, preferring to indulge in many chase scenes which soon become monotonous. The narrative was somewhat plodding and culminates in an unsatisfying deus ex machina which didn't really make much sense in light of previous events.

There were also some really clunky scenes which made the movie rather unbelievable. In the scene where Norris improvised his speech, revealing the artifice of his public presentation, none of his team were unhappy with this turn of events which was just weird. No-one bats an eyelid at someone ordering water in a bar (perhaps this is an alternative reality where prohibition never ended). Worst of all was when a pedestrian was struck by a vehicle and flew through the air, yet said was he ok! You would have thought that someone would have called for an ambulance or something, though this being the USA they might have checked his bank balance first.

This was a movie that didn't really do anything that hasn't been seen before with elements reminiscent of various other science fiction films such as Dark City, Minority Report and The Matrix. It was nice to look at with good use made of the New York setting, if not particularly innovative. The score was somewhat intrusive, serving to overwhelm the action rather than underpin it.

Overall this was moderately entertaining, but the combination of romance and science fiction resulted in a work which was not truly satisfying in either genre, as each only received a superficial treatment. The cast made for a passable way to spend your time but the film did not fulfil its potential.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

The American Dream?

Posted : 8 years, 11 months ago on 22 April 2015 06:45 (A review of Grand Theft Auto IV)

After a few releases set in different locales the GTA series returns to Liberty City, last seen in the first 3D title of the franchise, GTA III. This is anything but a re-run however, taking full advantage of the PS3's hardware to deliver the most sophisticated game in the series to date. The contrasts to GTA III are striking, in place of a mute and colourless protagonist you get Nico Bellic, an impressively complex and intriguing personality who you will find out a lot more about as you progress through the main missions.

This time the story is a lot more serious than before and the narrative is much stronger; in place of a slightly random collection of characters and missions there are inter-related episodes and the characters you encounter will at times pass comment on your actions and who you have been hanging out with which made the whole thing feel much more realistic. The storyline tackles some interesting themes such as whether it is wise to seek revenge, can an immigrant create a new life for themselves or will they be burdened by the past and how people can see the world differently on account of their personalities. A big change to the more cartoonish style of previous GTAs.

Indeed, realism has been enhanced in many aspects of the game. GTA III was an impressive achievement at the time but this expands on it in so many ways. In place of an elevated rail system with a few stations there is an integrated overhead rail and subway system with several lines and dozens of stations. When travelling on the system you even get recorded announcements for each station. You can also get around town by taking taxi rides (as long as you have the money); doing so allows you to watch the city go by or you can just skip straight to the destination. The fast food outlets and clothes shops return from San Andreas as does the dating. These elements work in pretty much the same way as before though I did miss the fluctuating waistline element from SA which was pretty entertaining. As before there is a large range of cars and motorcycles in the city but their physics have been upgraded a bit, making them a bit trickier to control at first. You can actually cause a vehicle to spin out this time but it doesn't take too much time to get used to this.

The best thing about the game for me was Liberty City itself. It is just amazing. Each neighborhood has its own distinctive character such as one area which has many Korean-owned businesses indicated by bi-lingual signage. The attention to detail is fantastic: smoke stacks in industrial areas puff out smoke into the atmosphere, skyscrapers are floodlit at night, traffic lights sway in the breeze. Driving around town is a pleasure and the landscapes are so varied that it never feels repetitive.

The downside of all this is that the amount of detail used makes the city difficult to render resulting in noticeable pop-up, blurry backgrounds with greater distance and a slight jerkiness to the game engine. These aren't a huge problem by any means but they do detract from the experience a little. A bigger weakness is some of the missions. There were some strong ones but a fair number revolve around driving to a destination and shooting a bunch of guys which was a little monotonous at times. Rockstar have added a useful cover system which was a nice touch but that old bugbear a flaky auto-targetting system made an unfortunate return. To be fair it works reasonably well most of the time but still decides to lock on to a guy about a block away instead of the one right next to you on occasion which was irritating. It is disappointing that this long term problem of the series was not fully resolved.

You might be wondering where the laughs and silliness have gone. Don't worry, there are plenty of comic touches throughout the game. Nico has a dry sense of humour which is especially noticeable in scenes with his naive but optimistic cousin Roman which are at times hilarious. There are also the typically ridiculous radio stations, amusing comic characters like Brucie and the usual silly puns which can be seen in signs across the city.

GTA IV is very much evolutionary rather than revolutionary so if you hate the GTA series then this is unlikely to convert you. Everyone else should definitely consider playing one of the best games of its type to date. Although it has a few flaws they don't significantly detract from the overall experience of what is a very accomplished game.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Thriller in Manila?

Posted : 8 years, 11 months ago on 12 April 2015 05:50 (A review of Metro Manila)

Following the fortunes of a poor farmer and his family who travel to the capital in search of a better life, Metro Manila examines to what lengths people would go to in order to get out of a desperate situation.

The film began quite slowly which brought across the pace of rural life. In contrast, once the Ramirez family have arrived in Manila a combination of hand held shooting and fast jump cutting effectively convey the chaotic nature of a fast developing metropolis. These scenes seemed to be aiming for a documentary-style realism which gave the feel of a Phillipines version of Salaam Bombay. The emphasis was very much on social commentary, showing how naive migrants are taken advantage of by unscrupulous citizens.

The protagonists soon find themselves in a depressing slum area and in urgent need of money to survive. Mai resorts to working as an exotic dancer in a sleazy bar whilst her husband Oscar seems to have struck lucky by finding a role as a security guard for a company which transports money around the city in armoured cars. The style of the movie changes here to become a fairly standard heist film and though engaging enough the plot was not particularly surprising. Apart from the unusual setting it was very much like other products of the genre.

The cast were generally quite impressive and there was good chemistry between Jake Macapagal as Oscar Ramirez and John Arcilla who played his boss Douglas Ong. Althea Vega as Oscar's wife Mai looked the part but her performance was a little flat in some scenes where dramatic events took place which should have resulted in a stronger emotional reaction. The supporting cast were also effective though I found the playboy who styled himself after American rappers completely unconvincing, though this was as much the fault of the script as anything else.

The film suffered from being a little overlong with a subplot about a plane hijack which could have been easily excised as it was not really relevant and just served to slow down the pace of the principal narrative. In contrast the plot strand about Mai's work in the sex industry felt very much underdeveloped. Stronger plotting and dialogue here would have helped to make it an important part of the drama, rather than just being needlessly voyeuristic. It would also have been better if Oscar had been shown to be struggling with a moral dilemma concerning his actions which would have been more believable.

Despite its flaws Metro Manila is worth seeing on account of the distinctive setting which is nicely shot. It isn't a classic by any means but is certainly worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Grim tale of post-war London

Posted : 8 years, 12 months ago on 1 April 2015 05:51 (A review of 10 Rillington Place)

Director Richard Fleischer must have been particularly interested in serial killers as this film followed a biopic of the Boston Strangler made just a few years earlier. This time the setting is the Notting Hill of the 1940s and 50s, at this time a dreary suburb during an era of post-war austerity rather than the desirable area known to viewers of 1999's romantic comedy starring Julia Roberts and Hugh Grant.

The film has an authentic feel, being filmed in part in the actual street where the events portrayed took place though it was actually no 7 that was used as the occupants of no 10 were unwilling to move out during the production period. Despite the fact that it was made in the early 70s the impression is given that the area had not changed much over the years, having an extremely drab look and desolate atmosphere.

Into this area come the hapless fantasist Timothy Evans played by John Hurt and his likeable partner Beryl (Judy Geeson). They rent out a cheap, tatty apartment from the landlord John Christie which proves to be an unfortunate choice. Hurt does well with the Welsh accent and Evans emerges as an impressively rounded character, annoying at times yet also inspiring pathos elsewhere. His fantasising and outright lies are irritating yet he is also naive and at times easily manipulated. Beryl is a less complex personality, but sympathetically portrayed by Geeson.

British character actor Richard Attenborough took on the Christie role and gave a performance of impressive restraint and control. Apparently the real life Christie was extremely softly spoken and Attenborough was faithful to this. Christie never raises his voice yet is extremely sinister, seeming to relish the control he can gain over others. The cramped environs of the flats have a claustrophobic feel to them which gave the whole thing an oppressive, stifling mood. In some scenes Christie is shot in partial shadow, a nice touch of film noir stylistically.

The action eventually leads to a mishandled court case, a travesty of justice which is followed by a discovery which shed new light on the preceding events.

Based on Ludovic Kennedy's non-fiction account of the same title, 10 Rillington Place sensitively portrays some grim events and aims for historical accuracy rather than sensationalism. There was one part of the plot which was based on supposition rather than hard evidence but this otherwise seemed to stick very closely to the facts. Attenborough was truly memorable as Christie, amazingly cold and ruthless. For me the film's only flaw was that it does not explore Christie's early life very much so there wasn't a substantial amount of explanation for his perverse crimes. In every other respect this was extremely impressive and strangely overlooked.


0 comments, Reply to this entry


« Prev12 3 Next »